Limited Time OfferFLAT 20% off & $20 bonus sign up. Order Now
Save Time and Improve Grade - Get Professional Help Now!
New! Hire Essay Assignment Writer Online and Get Flat 20% Discount!!Order Now
ITC 508
Australia
Charles Sturt University
Rationale
This assessment task will assess the following learning outcome/s:
· be able to describe the relationship of analysis and design activities to the System Development Life Cycle (SDLC).
· be able to analyse a case study and construct a business proposal to argue the feasibility of a client software proposal.
· be able to model various aspects of systems to construct quality diagrams for use in a system development project.
· to be able to verify and validate a system design.
Marking criteria and standards
The tasks in this assessment involve a sequence of several steps and therefore you will be marked on the correctness of your answer as well as clear and neat presentation of your diagrams, where required.
| Criteria | HD | DI | CR | PS | FL |
| Based on the Use Cases identified in Assessment 02, Create a storyboard of the dialog, showing the sequence of sketches of the screen for each step of the dialog. You can select any eight Use cases
16 Marks | Eight (8) use cases of the subsystem are identified; Created storyboard and showed each step clearly |
Eight (8) use cases of the subsystem are identified; and Created correctly storyboard of minimum six use cases. | Eight (8) use cases of the subsystem are identified; and Created correctly storyboard of minimum four use cases and there are some mistakes in the flow of information of some of the use cases
| Eight (8) use cases of the subsystem are identified; and Created correctly storyboard of minimum three use cases and there are some mistakes in the flow of information for some use cases.
| Use cases identified are wrong and Storyboard is incorrect as well.
|
| Explain what is Drill Down and identify /discuss one of the Drill Down report for your project. 6 Marks | Explanation and report is accurate and referencing and citation is done as per APA. | Mostly comprehensive report with minor issues. Referencing is also properly done as per APA | Explanation and Report is adequately done, with some mistakes. References also provided. | Reasonable documentation describes the report as well. Referencing is poorly done. | Explanation and Report both are wrong. |
| Presentation and clarity (accuracy, spelling, grammar, punctuation) 2 Marks | Fluent writing style appropriate to the assignment with accurate grammar and spelling. Word limit is maintained. | Mostly Fluent writing style appropriate to assignment with accurate grammar and spelling. Word limit is maintained. | Mostly fluent writing style appropriate to the assignment with mostly accurate grammar and spelling. Minor omissions only. Word limit is exceeded or falls short by more than 10%. | Writing style not always fluent or well organised and grammar and spelling contain errors. Word limit is exceeded or falls short by more than 20%. | Writing style not fluent or well-organised, and many grammatical and spelling mistakes.Word limit is ignored completely. |
| Referencing and Citation 1 Marks | Referencing is mainly accurate and according to the APA standard. All references are cited in the text. | Referencing is mainly accurate and according to the APA standard. Most of the references are cited in the text. | Some attempt at referencing and according to the APA standard. Few references are cited in the text. | Attempt at referencing but not exactly according to APA standard and only few references are cited in the text. | Referencing is absent/ unsystematic. |
15,000+ happy customers and counting!